« Goldwater vs. conventional wisdom | Home | Digital TV battles »

June 3, 2002

America's #1 Domestic Problem

Education? Environment? Health care? My vote: our legal system--for it is the flaws in this system that has cripled many of the other institutions of our society. As George Will put it in his column today "Americans are not losing their minds, but they are afraid of using their minds. They are afraid to exercise judgment--afraid of being sued." As former senators George McGovern and Alan Simpson--two prominent politicians from opposite sides of the political spectrum--wrote recently in the WSJ:

Up and down the levels of responsibility in schools, hospitals and courts, "can do" has been replaced with "can't do." Talk to teachers and doctors, and their frustration erupts. Teachers feel crushed by bureaucracy and no longer have authority to maintain order in classrooms. With doctors, the situation is worse. A new poll suggests that doctors, instead of focusing on the best medical judgment, worry more about protecting themselves from potential lawsuits. Legal fear drives them to prescribe medicines and order tests, even invasive procedures, that they feel are unnecessary. Reputable studies estimate that this "defensive medicine" squanders $50 billion a year, enough to provide medical care to millions of uninsured Americans.

McGovern and Simpson place the blame squarely on the law:

There is a culprit here: our legal system. Law, as we sometimes forget, is the foundation for all social dealings. When law is not trusted, people begin to feel uncomfortable in dealing with each other. People stop doing what's sensible. A healthy system of law should make people comfortable doing what's right, and nervous doing what's wrong. Today, law makes people nervous in doing practically anything.

The evidence is all around us. Ministers in some churches have stopped counseling parishioners because, who knows, there might be a lawsuit if the couple later gets divorced. Ridiculous warning labels are now tacked onto practically every product. Much like the young shepherd crying "wolf," these labels discourage people from paying attention to the warnings that are really needed.

Will, McGovern, and Simpson all refer to Philip K. Howard's book "The Collapse of the Common Good," who, according to the latter two:

...shows us how, in trying to guard against real and perceived abuses of authority in the 1960s, reformers removed the authority of judges, principals and teachers to make commonsense choices. The theory was that each dispute would now be resolved as a matter of individual rights, where the claimant would either prove his claim or not.

But the theory has a fatal flaw: Many disputes in social settings involve value judgments, not "proof." All that's needed to bring a lawsuit is a theory. In hindsight, it is often easy to think of something different that could have been done. Resourceful lawyers soon learned they could bring lawsuits for almost anything, and in almost any amount. The idea of "rights" was turned upside down, from being a shield against abuse to being a sword for personal gain.

But the law is not supposed to be a sporting contest. It is supposed to provide guidance of what's right and what's wrong. Oliver Wendell Holmes once defined law as "the prophesies of what courts will do." Today, people have no idea what a court will do. That's why Americans have become fearful.

McGovern & Simpson (along with Richard Thornburgh, Newt Gingrich, Paul Simon, Eric Holder, Tom Kean, George Rupp, John Silber, Shelby Steele, Mary Ann Glendon, Pete Peterson, Shelly Lazarus, and Harry Kamen among others) are supporting Philip K. Howard's new effort called Common Good, which was created to "advocate a basic overhaul of our legal system." From the Common Good website:

Common Good is a bipartisan initiative to overhaul America's lawsuit culture. Fear of litigation has undermined our freedom to make sensible decisions. Doctors, teachers, ministers, even little league coaches, find their daily decisions hampered by legal fear. Our system of justice, long America's greatest pride, is now considered a tool for extortion, not balance.

To the extent that our social institutions are dysfunctional, much of it can be traced to the shortcomings of our legal system--which sucks resources, perverts behavior, and intimidates common sense.

As the senators put it: "Lawsuits, a vital tool of justice, support a free society only when judges and legislatures take the responsibility of deciding who can sue for what. Otherwise, fear replaces freedom."

Leave a comment

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
  • Subscribe to feed

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Chris published on June 3, 2002 9:30 AM.

Goldwater vs. conventional wisdom was the previous entry in this blog.

Digital TV battles is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.